A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From February 13, 2013, the Defendant served as a standing director of the Victim C Union in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, and is a person who manages and supervises all the tasks, such as the operation and fund execution of D Union.

1. On September 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) issued an order to execute five million won for the purpose of military supply marketing funds from E, a higher government office of CF, and (b) issued a document as if he/she requested F, a seller, to purchase related goods in an amount equivalent to five million won; and (c) paid five million won as if he/she requested the purchase of related goods; and (d) again received a return in cash on September 30, 2016, and kept it for personal consumption.

As above, while the Defendant was in custody for a victim as a matter of duty, at the C association office around November 2016, the Defendant arbitrarily delivered one million won to G, who is the Defendant’s seat, for the purpose of living expenses, etc., and used the total amount of five million won for four times from the above date to November 2017, such as the list of crimes in the annexed list of crimes.

2. If, as an executive officer of a DDR, funds specified for use by a higher government agency are paid in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations, the Defendant has a duty to manage and supervise such funds in a transparent manner, and to ensure that funds are properly used.

Nevertheless, the Defendant traded with C as a supplier of a military unit in 2015.

While H demanded C to pay damages and continuously file a civil petition with C in violation of the occupational duty to comply with the pertinent laws and regulations, H created the fund through the most active transaction, despite the absence of the obligation to compensate for damages of C Union, and attempted to receive a civil petition with H to purchase a pat that is not necessary for C to purchase at a price lower than the market price and pay the money for that purpose.

Accordingly, the defendant in 2015.