logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.01.13 2014고단2727
공무집행방해
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 12, 2014, around 02:30 on October 12, 2014, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) the Defendant, at the Changwon Police Station C district unit, a police officer belonging to the Changwon, the Changwon Police Station C district unit, was urged to return home, and (b) the Defendant, upon receiving a report on the disturbance from the 3rd floor so that he was sent to the third floor so that he was able to take home, and (c) the Defendant, following the Defendant: (d) who was getting on and off the elevator, recommended home again; (d) the Defendant, who was satisfing, called “pathoba”, sound

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of public duties by police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

2. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [the scope of recommendation] The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the grounds for sentencing] is that there is a need for strict punishment for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties in light of the fact that there is a need for strict punishment for the crime of obstruction of official duties in order to establish the legal order of the State and eradicate the situation of the public authority.

However, the court shall take into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant's mistake and reflect the fact that the defendant has committed a crime exceeding the fine, and the fact that there is no criminal record beyond the fine, and shall determine the punishment as ordered in consideration of all the circumstances which form the conditions for the sentencing, such as the background of the crime in

arrow