logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.06.03 2014고단882
공무집행방해
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 05:40 on March 24, 2014, the Defendant solicited the Defendant to return home from the police officer belonging to the Changbu Police Station C District District, who was dispatched after receiving a report from the Defendant, at the singing shop located at the window B of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and was on board the elevator. However, the Defendant made a sudden change, “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am am, and am am back.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of public duties by police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing).

3. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order is that the crime of this case is not deemed to have been committed by a police officer who was dispatched after receiving a report by the Defendant’s disturbance and committing an assault. In light of the fact that the Defendant has recently been punished for the same kind of crime, and that there is a need for strict punishment of obstruction of performance of official duties in order to establish a state’s legal order and eradicate the light of public authority.

However, the defendant's mistake is recognized and reflected, the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine, etc. shall be considered as favorable circumstances, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the circumstances which form the conditions for sentencing, such as the character, conduct and environment of the defendant.

arrow