A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 8, 2019, at around 02:20, the Defendant received 112 reports from the Defendant that he was assaulted by the Defendant in front of the “C” located in B, and gave a bath to the police officers of the luminous Police Station D District E, etc., dispatched to the Defendant in order to separate the Defendant from the foregoing F and G and to listen to their statements.

Accordingly, the defect that the slope E said that the defendant’s hummatic defect, the defendant called “Yama, E,” and the defendant humnama, humnama, humnama, and humnae E’s left kumnae at one time by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported case by the assistant E, a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act provides that police officers dispatched to the case of assault by the defendant shall be deemed to have exercised violence and have been punished several times for violent crimes; however,

1. Of the charges of dismissing prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, the victims F and G assaulted at the time and place stated in the facts constituting a crime is dismissed, and the prosecution is dismissed as the victims expressed their intention not to prosecute after prosecution.