logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.06.14 2016가단235908
손해배상
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,283,195 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from May 11, 2017 to June 14, 2017.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) around 06:10 on April 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 06:10 on the 2nd day of Songpa-gu Seoul District Office; (b) on the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2

3) Subsequent to the Plaintiff’s continued driving away on April 25, 2016, the Defendant, around 06:20 on April 25, 2016, lost the head part of the victim’s head twice due to chemical parts, which are dangerous things on the road in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and caused the victim to suffer approximately three weeks of treatment (hereinafter “instant tort”).

(4) The Defendant was convicted on August 18, 2016 due to the above special injury, etc., and appealed from 8 months of imprisonment (Seoul Eastern District Court 2016No1818). The sentencing was mitigated by taking into account the fact that some of the money was additionally deposited in the appellate court, but the sentencing was mitigated by taking into account the fact that the nature of the crime is not good and the agreement with the victim was not reached, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 6 months (Seoul East Eastern District Court 2016No1301) (Seoul Eastern District Court 201).

was sentenced to the court

(However, there has been no statutory restraint for agreement with the plaintiff who is the victim). 【The ground for recognition] The facts of no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 13, and 14 (including provisional number), and Eul evidence No. 1

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the tort of this case.

2. Scope of damages.

A. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion is 22,535,917 won in total to the defendant [=30,535,917 won in =10,330,390 won in active damages + small damages8.

arrow