Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Defendants ordering payment to the Plaintiff A in excess of the following amount:

Basic Facts

The court's explanation on this part is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The court's explanation on this part of the liability for damages is based on the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the following parts used or added.

[Supplementary or additional parts] Paragraph 7(b) of the first instance judgment: (a) 1 of the first instance court’s text added “the evidence mentioned above and the overall purport of the arguments as a result of the examination of the medical records for the director of an affiliated university set-off hospital in this court.” (b) 8 of the first instance court’s judgment, the Defendants asserted that there was a neological disorder on January 16, 2014 to the Plaintiff only before the end of 07:16:00,000, and there is no possibility that the medical personnel of the Defendant hospital might be deemed to have been excessive since the above time was not carried out with the Plaintiff,” and “the court below's first instance judgment made efforts to exclude the Plaintiffs from the computation of the first instance judgment’s medical expenses and the possibility that the Plaintiffs would suffer from the injury to the Plaintiff’s hospital as the result of the first instance court’s evaluation of the medical records, but it was difficult for the Plaintiffs to be excluded from the computation of the first instance court’s losses.”

. Plaintiff A’s property damage.