1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance for the acceptance of the judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case where the defendant either cited or added part of the arguments or the evidence presented by the court of first instance as follows, and thus, it is acceptable as it is by the main sentence of Article 420

An abbreviationd name established in the judgment of the first instance is also used below the same.

[Supplementary or supplementary parts] 1-A of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance.

The part of the second half of each week in the judgment of the court of first instance is divided into “Indones Accommodation.” The 4-15th part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “The defendant has withdrawn the report of the Fair Trade Commission in accordance with the above modified contract and adjustment agreement, and the plaintiff thereafter paid the balance of the construction cost of this case until July 18, 2014, and completed the total of KRW 4.45 billion.5 billion.” The part of the first half and the second half of the judgment below as follows: “The defendant was the defendant.” With respect to the decision of the plaintiff’s unfair subcontract price claimed by the defendant, it is difficult to find objective evidence that the reporter unilaterally determined the contract amount due to reasons such as the adjustment of the contract amount due to the lack of funds of the ordering person, etc., and that it is difficult for the reporter to conclude that the contract amount was modified through the additional adjustment of the contract amount and the additional adjustment of the contract amount.”