logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.12.21 2015가단24767
치료비
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Around July 6, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff visited the dental department E in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, and that the Defendant, a doctor of the foregoing dental department, took care of the dental department around the 7th day of the same month without the Plaintiff’s consent, under the pretext that the Defendant, a doctor of the foregoing dental department took care of the dental department before and after the 21th day of the same month.

Since then, the defendant, on the plaintiff's filing of a petition, made a public action or intimidation against the plaintiff, rather than the defendant.

Therefore, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff is liable to pay KRW 100,000,000 (the claim amount increased to KRW 100,000,000 as a result of the amendment of the claim and the cause of the claim as of July 4, 2016) as compensation for damages caused by the above tort.

2. We examine the judgment, and there is no evidence to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion.

Rather, according to the evidence evidence Nos. 5 and 6, the Ulsan District Prosecutors' Office, which investigated the defendant's injury caused by occupational negligence, may recognize the fact that the defendant, without the plaintiff's consent, was subject to a disposition of suspicion on April 15, 2016 on the ground that there is no evidence or evidence to deem that the defendant had caused the lower time without the plaintiff's consent.

The plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow