1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Around April 26, 2017, the summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion was as follows: (a) the Defendant, in two hands around the Plaintiff’s house gate located in Gyeonggi-gun C, carried the Plaintiff’s bat, pushed the Plaintiff’s bat around the left side of the Plaintiff; (b) the Plaintiff exceeded the Plaintiff’s ground by generating the Plaintiff’s fat, thereby inflicting an injury on the Plaintiff, such as catdum, tensions, and plesphers of the fat, fat, and a

Therefore, the Defendant should pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 828,10 for medical expenses incurred by the tort, KRW 1,352,230 for lost earnings, KRW 2,819,660 for consolation money.

2. In full view of the fact-finding results and the overall purport of the arguments about Gap evidence No. 9, Eul evidence No. 9, D Hospital of this court, and E-type medical staff, on April 26, 2017, the plaintiff and F were in conflict with the plaintiff's home, and the defendant living in the vicinity of the plaintiff's home was suffering from the defendant's house, and the court's District Prosecutors' Office filed a criminal complaint with the purport that the plaintiff was injured by the plaintiff at the time of investigation into the above case, and it is difficult to view that the defendant was using the plaintiff at the time of the plaintiff's visit because the defendant was different from the place where the plaintiff was suffering from the defendant's accident. While the plaintiff's statements were unclear at the time of this case's visit, other witness's statements are only identical to the plaintiff and the defendant, and thus, the plaintiff did not have sufficient evidence to prove the defendant's act of injury at the time of the plaintiff's visit No. 271-type 47, 2717.