Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for five months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On May 19, 2014, around 22:40 on May 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) boarded the victim G at the top of the Sejong Culture Center located in Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu, Seoul, and was in the opening-dong of Gangnam-gu, the destination of which was the victim, and stolen the victim’s cell phone and cot with a verification color room and cot which contain the EL branch phone and public official identification; (b) purchased the drinking water in the front of the lux-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si

B. On May 19, 2014, at around 23:15, the Defendant: (a) taken the victim H, who was drunk to F-si in front of the end station in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, as a customer, and went to the lower city, the destination of the F-si; (b) taken the victim at around 23:30, around 23:30, the Defendant: (c) taken the victim by saying, “I cannot go to the lower village”; (d) brought the victim to the victim, and (e) took the victim’s cell phone at approximately KRW 80,000, the market price of the victim’s cell phone, which was owned by the victim.

2. Defendant B

A. On April 2014, the Defendant found one mobile phone of ggal lusium 700,000 won at the market value, which is owned by the victim in the Isi operated by the Defendant in Seoul City.

The Defendant, without taking necessary procedures such as returning the acquired property to the victim, embezzled the property he/she had on his/her own mind.

B. On May 2014, the Defendant found one cell phone of a opon phone with a value of KRW 1 million at the market price owned by the victim lost in his name in the Isi operated by the Defendant in Seoul Si.

The Defendant, without taking necessary procedures such as returning the acquired property to the victim, embezzled the property he/she had on his/her own mind.

Summary of Evidence

1..