Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Criminal facts

Defendant

A on July 23, 2008, at the Seoul Southern District Court, sentenced a year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, and three years of suspended execution, which became final and conclusive on July 31, 2008.

[The latter concurrent crimes of Article 37 of the Criminal Code] Defendant A is the representative director of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., Defendant B is the vice president, and Defendant D is the chief director.

around October 2007, Defendants and D made a false statement that “The victim G (the age of 49) was introduced through F, a branch office in the office of 9th floor E-building in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, but Defendant A had housing site development rights in the new city H, and the apartment and commercial buildings are in progress by developing this place and selling the apartment and commercial buildings. At the latest, around March 2008, the date of business approval is expected to be the date of business approval. The apartment and commercial buildings are leased KRW 70 million as business promotion expenses that grant the right to vicariously sell and publicize the apartment and commercial buildings.”

However, in fact, Defendant A did not have the ability or intent to exercise the right to develop the housing site or to sell the land on behalf of the victim because Defendant A did not have any capacity or intent to exercise the right to sell the apartment, commercial building, and public relations.

Since then, Defendant A had been detained in Seoul Southern District Detention Center around December 10, 2007 due to the criminal facts obtained by acquiring a sum of KRW 315 million from January 2006 to November 2006, Defendant A urged the Defendant B, who had opened the meeting, to continue to commit a crime of land development, such as “I would like to attract and resolve the company even if you want to do so.”

As a result, Defendant B and D stated in the office around January 15, 2008 that Defendant A, the representative director of the office, went back to a foreign country by leaving the victim's children studying in the foreign country. Defendant B continuously shows the plan for the use of the H site development project, etc. to the victim, and Defendant B continues to implement the housing site development project of five blocks in the H of Pakistan. The scale of the business is three trillion won, and the sale advertisement and publicity is about 1%.

30 billion won.