Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for five months and for one year, respectively.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B As the actual owner of the “C” in the Si of Gunsan, and the owner of the above gameland employed by the Defendant A in the name of the said gameland, no person shall exchange, arrange for exchange or repurchase the tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Nevertheless, on April 2016, the Defendants: (a) entered into a smartphone display system, “D,” which has developed a “D,” which has a function of exchanging electronic currency in cash, into a franchise store; and (b) received subscription fees and fees from business owners; (c) using the said “D” smartphone display system to customers finding each game site; and (d) deliver the amount of the relevant electronic currency to customers, excluding 10% of the amount corresponding to the game score as commission; and (e) from April 29, 2016, the Defendants entered into a contract with F, G, etc., which provides that customers may receive cash transfer, excluding bank fees, from the money equivalent to the said electronic currency via the said exchange function; and (e) entered into a contract with the said “D,” from around April 29,

6. By June 6, 200, in the above "C" located in H in Gunsan-si, Sinsan-si, the money was transferred from "D" to its own account after deducting 10% of the money exchange commission and 900 won of the bank commission, by making customers pay in advance electronic currency purchased from the above D to customers in the name of the game who made the game, in accordance with the scores obtained by the customers.

As a result, the Defendants exchanged the results obtained through the use of game products in collusion with F, E, and G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A suspect interrogation protocol (F) and a copy of the suspect interrogation protocol (G);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (in cases of suspect B interviews), investigation reports (in cases of D business owners), Busan District Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 3501, etc., investigation reports (in cases of D business operators and store stores in this case), investigation reports (in cases of attaching list of store stores in this case), investigation reports

1. Criminal facts;