logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2019.08.22 2019고단118
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for six months, respectively.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

From May 18, 2018, A operated a general game providing business with the trade name of "D recreation room" in the building of the Gyeong-gun of Seongbuk-do and the second floor of the 2nd floor, and the defendant B is the husband of the defendant A and the employee of the above game room.

1. No defendant A game products related business entity shall allow others to gamble or perform other speculative acts by using game products, or leave them to do so, and no one shall exchange, arrange for money exchange, or engage in selling business with other tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products;

From February 11, 2019 to February 27, 2019, the Defendant operated the said “D Recreation”, and had customers play a game by installing 65 game apparatuses, such as the 25th, stoporascers, 30, and 10th, Estre, and had customers play a game. After deducting a fee from 10%, the Defendant exchanged a total of 14,517,000 won from 20,000 won to 30,000 won for cash exchange.

As a result, the defendant let customers do gambling and other speculative acts using game products, or leave them to do so, and exchanged tangible and intangible results acquired by customers through the use of game products.

2. No person who defendant B shall engage in money exchange, money exchange, brokerage, or repurchase business with tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products;

From February 11, 2019 to February 27, 2019, the Defendant exchanged an amount equivalent to KRW 16,251,000 in total to customers by making a deduction of at least 10% of commission fees from 20,000 to 300,000, when the Defendant works as an employee in the said “DD” room, and making a deduction of the game score obtained by customers.

As a result, the defendant exchanged the tangible and intangible results obtained by customers through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. E.

arrow