logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.04.18 2013고합79
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

83,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The above surcharge shall be equivalent to the defendant.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

On November 19, 197, the applicant for medical treatment and custody (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Psychotropic Drugs Control Act at the Gwangju High Court on November 19, 199, 2 years of suspended execution for the violation of the Psychotropic Drugs Control Act, 4 years of suspended execution for the violation of the Psychotropic Drugs Control Act at the Gwangju District Court on June 3, 2004, and on May 10, 2007 at the Gwangju District Court on May 10, 2007.

In addition, on June 28, 2011, the Gwangju District Court sentenced one year and two months to the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and completed the execution of the above punishment on March 4, 2012.

1. On April 9, 2012, around 20:30, the injured Defendant suffered injury, such as “D” underground parking lots located in Seo-gu in Gwangju, for the reason that the injured Party E (Nam and 40 years of age) did not have a sexual intercourse with an agricultural product distribution contract. In the process of having the injured Party into the K7 car that he had a defect in other places and got the victim into the Republic of Korea where he had been detained, the injured Defendant suffered injury, such as the victim’s head at several times and kneeee, which require approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

2. On April 9, 2012, the Defendant forced the victim to prepare a loan certificate stating that “F” 16,400,000 won will be repaid to A by threatening the victim to receive reimbursement from the victim E in order to realize an agricultural product distribution contract. In other words, the Defendant forced the victim to prepare a loan certificate stating that “F” in the first floor coffee shop located in the Seo-gu Seoul, Seo-gu, Gwangju to obtain reimbursement from the victim E in order to realize the agricultural product distribution contract.

3. The Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

around 22:00 on October 21, 2012, the Defendant administered 607 “Hmoto” in Gwangju Northern-gu G, and approximately 0.1g of Mesacopon (one philoopon; hereinafter referred to as “philoopon”) in a coffee.

Facts of the cause of medical treatment and custody.

arrow