logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.11.22 2013노920
상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is that the defendant's act is a passive resistance against the victims' attack and against the attack of the victim E and F, and it is merely one-time supporting the victim F's back-to-date, and there is no credibility because the victims and G have made a statement contrary to each other in relation to the place where the victims E are able to control the victim's attack. In light of the fact that the place where the occurrence of the case occurred is a narrow apartment, and the defendant was in a situation where the victims cannot be able to reflect against the victims, the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of the case, is erroneous in misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the judgment of the court below and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the grounds for appeal: ① The victims and witnesses agree from the police to the court below, namely, ① the victim E-mail that the defendant was flicked, flicked, flicked, flicked, flicked, flicked, flicked, flicked, flicked, flicked, flicked, etc. of the victim Flick, when the defendant was flick, and flicked, etc. of the victim; although there were some statements posted by the victims and G flicked, the credibility of the statement made by the victim and G cannot be rejected on the grounds of this, ② the victim E-, and Flick, each damaged part of the victim E-mail and the damaged part of E-mail requires treatment; ② the victim’s 2 week 2 week 3 week slick or flick, etc.

arrow