logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.07.26 2018고정263
상해등
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

The Defendant and B(the age of 57) are those who were in a relationship of money.

1. 상해 피고인은 2015. 8. 28. 17:00 경 서울 구로구 C 사망한 자신의 딸 D의 E 병원 장례식 장에서 B을 포함한 “ 시 댁 식구들은 모두 나가라 ”며 소리를 지르면서 B의 머리카락을 잡아 당겨 치료 일수 미상의 상해를 가하였다.

2. A special intimidation: (a) around 14:00 on October 4, 2015, the Defendant saw the brick, a dangerous object that had been on the street, in dispute with B, due to his/her father’s ancillary D problem that died in front of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Fro, into his/her hand, and killed B.

“Along with the high sound, it threatened and threatened B with the above brick as if it had been put on B.

Maz.

1. The defendant also acknowledges the fact that the defendant was suffering from the head of B at the time and place specified in the facts charged.

However, there are statements and medical statements in the witness B and G investigative agencies and this court, as well as in the evidence shown in the support of B's injury.

However, each of the above statements by B and G is contrary to the witness H and I’s respective legal statements, and there was a dispute between B and the Defendant on October 11, 2015 regarding the death of CCTV photographs, B, and B and the Defendant, and only two years after the date of the occurrence of the instant case, it is difficult to believe it as it is in light of the fact that B submitted a written complaint.

In addition, the above medical certificate was issued more than two years of time from the date of the occurrence of the instant case, and the cause of injury in the column of " future treatment opinion" was prepared according to the statement of B.

In light of this, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, including the above written diagnosis, was injured by the defendant's act around the date and time stated in the facts charged.

There is insufficient evidence to acknowledge it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

2. The judgment on the issue of special intimidation is as follows: (a) as the Defendant saw both hands as a shicker and thrown away to B.

arrow