logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.07.05 2018고단720
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 06:50 on January 20, 2018, the Defendant attempted to take a cab in the victim D (the remaining, 54 years old) in front of the C hotel located in Busan, Daegu, Daegu, Busan, and sought to take a cab in the victim D (the other is: (b) but the victim has a c

For the reason that the phrase "" was made, the property was damaged so that the surface of the garrising part of the garrising part after the garrising of the garrising 2 times on the ground that the garrising part was made, and the garrising part was damaged by the garrising part.

2. Around 07:10 of the above day, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by openly insulting the victim by taking a large voice of the victim, “I would have been able to do so, I would have been able to do so, and I would have been able to do so. I would have been able to do so, and I would have been able to do so. I would have been able to do so, and I would have been able to do so. I would have been able to do so, and I would have been able to do so. I would have been able to do so. I would have been able to do so, and I would have been able to do so. I would have been able to do so. I would have been able to do so.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written complaints and written estimates;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of a fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment Order is an unfavorable circumstance, where the police insultings the police on the ground that the taxi was destroyed by the string so that the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the 2017.

However, the fact that the defendant recognizes the facts charged and seriously reflects the facts charged, there is no record that the defendant has been subject to punishment exceeding the fine, and the defendant has agreed with the victim of the crime of destroying property.

arrow