logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.12.14 2018고단2648
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 7, 2018, around 05:20 on 05:20, the Defendant damaged an unregistered property at a 's singing room’ of the Victim B’s broad-name C underground in the Victim B management. Around 112, the Defendant heard the horses for calculating the drinking value from E to the chode of the light-name police station D District 2 team affiliated with the 2 team of the light-name police station called out upon receipt of the 112 report, and then damaged the market value by taking advantage of the chos and cups owned by the victim and destroying them.

2. At the above time, the Defendant sexually insultingd the victim E by openly insulting the victim by referring him to a large voice of “shot, smelling, sniffing, garbage, sniffing, sniffing, and flinging to a flue,” which reads the victim E at the above time when he heard B, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A simplified statement in B;

1. To prepare a record of investigation reports;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In full view of the fact that the Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, committed the instant crime without being aware of, even during the period of repeated crime, while being in a repeated crime, there exist many records of the same kind of insult, interference with the performance of official duties, and violence, the details and motive of the crime, and the motive of the crime, and the fact that the police officer called out after receiving a report is under the presence of the police officer, such as crying the beer’s disease on the floor and hicking and taking a bath, etc., the Defendant need to be strictly punished.

However, in full view of the facts charged by the Defendant, the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victim of the crime of property damage, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., and other factors of sentencing as shown in the trial process, the sentence is determined as ordered.

arrow