1. The Defendant: 15,922,064 won to Plaintiff A; 15,834,892 won to Plaintiff B; 17,502,020 won to Plaintiff C; and 15,064 won to Plaintiff D.

1. Basic facts

A. The New M&D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “S&D”) is an executor of the business that newly constructs and sells the building of 2 stories underground and 15 stories above ground on the ground of 27,612.3 square meters in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government JJ (hereinafter “instant building”), and the Korea Urban Development Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Urban Development Corporation”) is a contractor awarded a contract for the construction of the instant building (hereinafter “the instant construction”) from IMD, and the Korea Asset Trust Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Korea Asset Trust”) is a trustee who received a real estate trust in relation to the instant sales business, and the Korea Asset Trust Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea Asset Trust”) is a beneficiary of the said real estate trust.

B. On March 29, 2004, Postal Development and Promotion Savings Bank, etc. entered into an agreement on business and agent business with Korea Urban Development and Promotion Savings Bank, etc., and took out loans of 12.5 billion won from Promotion Savings Bank, etc., and reported the commencement of the instant construction project on July 26, 2004, and Korea Urban Development commenced the instant construction project around that time.

C. Among them, the construction was suspended on September 2005, and the construction was resumed until February 2006, and the construction was resumed after March 2006. In September 2006, the construction of this case was resumed after the suspension of the construction of this case, and the construction of this case was resumed after September 2006 due to the fact that a school near the construction site, the contractor, filed a civil petition by noise while the construction of the 9th floor of the building of this case was underway. The construction of this case was resumed after the completion of the construction of the 15th floor around November 2007.

Plaintiff A (won) 180,277,000 Plaintiff B on November 14, 2004, 179,290,000 Plaintiff C on July 708, 2006, 198,16,000 Plaintiff C on July 18, 2006, for the sale price paid in the unit on the date of concluding the contract.