A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 18, 2014, at around 17:21, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report prior to the restaurant of the trade name “D” located in Kuju-si; and (b) made an assault by the Defendant, following the Defendant’s slopingF belonging to the Kuju Police Station E District Unit of the Kuju Police Station, who called “I would leave the place to the place of residence”, who called “I will leave the place to the place of residence”; and (c) expressed a slopingF’s wing part of the slopeF one time to the left hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Determination of Punishment] Suspension of Performance of Official Duties: The basic area [Determination of the area of recommendation] [Scope of punishment] six months to one year and four months [Scope of punishment]: the statutory penalty of Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act: one month to five years [whether suspended sentence is suspended] - there is no effort to recover negative damage: The reason for general participation: there is no criminal conviction or more for the suspension of execution, which is obvious of positive social relation, [decision of the sentence] there is no criminal conviction or more for the suspension of execution of six months, and 80 hours of community service;