The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

On October 2, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. by the Ulsan District Court, which became final and conclusive on October 11, 2014. On January 15, 2015, the same court was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for injury, etc. and eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for injury, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 4, 2015.

On September 27, 2014, from around 21:00 to 21:50, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by openly fluoring the victim D, who operates the said subdivision store, on the ground that the victim D, under the circumstances where there are many unspecified persons, opened the toilet door of the commercial building, on the ground that the victim D, who opened the said subdivision store, opened the toilet door of the commercial building, the victim she was not able to read the “fluort wal wal walk, walk walk, humb, hurg, hurg, so that the hurg halk, so that the hurg halk, and the hurg halk walk walk, and the har wal

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of case search and copy of judgment;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Handling concurrent crimes and exemption of punishment: the latter part of Articles 37 and 39 (1) of the Criminal Act ( Taking into account the degree of insult inflicted on the victim by the defendant, the equity between the cases in which a judgment has become final and conclusive concurrently with the crimes);