logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 03. 24. 선고 2015두60037 판결
(심리불속행) 제2차 납세의무자 지정에 따른 부과처분을 받은 사실이 없으므로 당연무효임[일부국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-30144 ( November 20, 2015)

Title

(C) If a taxpayer is not subject to a disposition of imposition due to the designation of the secondary taxpayer, the designation of the secondary taxpayer shall be void immediately.

Summary

(main point of the original trial) No fact exists that the second taxpayer has received a disposition of imposition due to the designation of the second taxpayer.

Related statutes

Article 24 of the National Tax Collection Act

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against each appellant.

Reasons

Examining the lower judgment and the grounds of appeal, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds of appeal under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure for Appeal, or are deemed to fall under each subparagraph of paragraph (3). Therefore, all appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow