logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.06.21 2013고단1197
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

An application filed by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Although the husband, who was in a de facto marital relationship with a person without a certain occupation, has already died around 198, the Defendant had been able to receive money from the victims in order to raise the living expenses when he had been able to obtain money from the victims when he had been able to obtain money from the victims when he had been able to obtain money from the victims in order to raise the living expenses.

1. On August 26, 2011, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the effect that “F Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu shall have to go to the victim’s own market, and there is no cash, and only 50,000 won loaned to the victim. The money will be repaid immediately as returned to her husband in a foreign country.”

However, the defendant did not have any income due to the absence of occupation, and even if he borrowed money from the victim due to the lack of property owned, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 50,000 from the time when he/she got the victim to receive KRW 50,000 on the same day from the victim, until December 28, 2012, by deceiving the victim as shown in the annexed crime inundation (1), and received KRW 153,470,000 in total over 266 times.

2. On January 18, 2013, the criminal defendant against the victim G made a false statement to the effect that “I church restaurant located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H is urgently needed to pay money, and only 80,000 won shall be loaned, and the payment shall be made immediately.”

However, the defendant did not have any income due to the absence of occupation, and even if he borrowed money from the victim due to the lack of property owned, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such and belongs to it from the victim.

arrow