1. The Defendants are based on Section 1, Section 2, Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, 6, and Section 1, among the second floor of the building listed in the attached list.

1. According to the overall purport of Gap's statements and arguments as to the cause of the claim, the facts as stated in the reasons for the claim are acknowledged. Thus, the defendants are obligated to deliver to the plaintiff the part (a) on the ship (a) which connects each point of Gap's annexed drawings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1 among the buildings listed in the annexed list among the buildings listed in the annexed list to the plaintiff in sequence.

2. The Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation’s assertion as to the assertion of the Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation asserts that the Plaintiff cannot deliver the leased building to the Plaintiff because it is an indirect possessor, other than a direct occupant, although it is not a lessee of the instant lease agreement. However, it cannot be refused to return the leased building on the ground that it does not directly possess the leased object when seeking the return of the leased object due to the termination of the lease agreement (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 90Da19695, Apr. 23,

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.