logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.07.02 2015고단248
총포ㆍ도검ㆍ화약류등단속법위반등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Where a defendant intends to possess guns A, swords, explosives, gas sprayers, electroshock weapons, or crossbows, he/she shall obtain permission from the commissioner of a district police agency having jurisdiction over his/her domicile in cases of guns, and permission from the chief of a police station having jurisdiction over his/her domicile in cases of swords, explosives, gas sprayers, or

Nevertheless, at around 00:10 on January 7, 2015, the defendant had one air gun in Yju-53 (5.5m) in B-53 (5m) around 00:10, the defendant had no permission from the commissioner of the competent district police agency.

2. Where a person intends to possess guns, swords, explosives, gas sprayers, electroshock weapons, or crossbows, he/she shall obtain permission from the commissioner of a district police agency having jurisdiction over the domicile in cases of guns, and permission from the chief of a police station having jurisdiction over the domicile in cases of swords, explosives, gas sprayers, electroshock weapons, or crossbows,

Nevertheless, at around 00:10 on January 7, 2015, the Defendant had one air gun with a 707m air gun (5.0m) in the Jeonju-gun E, Jeonbuk-gun, Seoul, without obtaining permission from the commissioner of the competent district police agency.

3. No joint criminal administration of the Defendants shall conduct hunting in a place other than a hunting ground.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to kill and capture 2 Mann by using air guns described in the above paragraphs (1) and (2) around the former North Korean E-gun where no hunting ground was established between January 6, 2015 and January 7, 2015.

As a result, Defendants hunted in places other than hunting grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. A protocol of seizure, a list of seizure and a protocol of destruction;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of air guns (e.g., air guns (e.g., grology 707), photographs, rapt photographs, and ranigraphic photographs;

1. Defendants: pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts and choice of punishment.

arrow