logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.09.27 2017구단64661
진폐보험급여부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On June 23, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for pneumoconiosis insurance benefits with the Defendant as a person who has been engaged in dusty work at an implied mining center, etc., and on June 23, 2017, the Defendant rendered a claim for the payment of the site for pneumoconiosis insurance benefits (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff according to the result of deliberation by the Pneumoconiosis Review Committee, which read “the pneumoconiosis type (0/0) and the cardiopulmonary function (F0).”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition of this case is legitimate or not, the plaintiff alleged that the disposition of this case by the defendant on a different premise falls under the type No. 1 of pneumoconiosis disease type, and thus, according to the result of the examination of the medical record as to the Chief of the Seoul National University Hospital, it can be acknowledged that the plaintiff presented a medical opinion that the plaintiff constitutes the pneumoconiosis disease type (0/0) as a result of the examination of the examination of the medical record as to the Chief of the Seoul National University University Hospital. In light of these facts, it is insufficient to recognize that the statement of the evidence No. 3 alone constitutes the pneumoconiosis type No. 1, and there is no other evidence to support this.

Therefore, the instant disposition is lawful.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow