logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.04.07 2016구단62927
진폐보험급여부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, who had been engaged in dusty work while working in the Mining Center B for 39 years, applied for pneumoconiosis insurance benefits to the Defendant.

B. On September 28, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition at the site level of pneumoconiosis insurance benefits (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff according to the result of deliberation by the Pneumoconiosis Review Board, which read “Madiopulmonary (0/1) and cardiopulmonary (F0).”

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence No. 1 and the purport of whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion falls under the type 1 of pneumoconiosis disease type, and thus, the Defendant’s disposition of this case based on a different premise is unlawful.

B. In light of the fact that the result of the medical record appraisal entrustment to the head of the Seoul Hospital at the Macheon-do University of this Court, that is, the appraisal presented the Plaintiff’s medical opinion that “the type of pneumoconiosis: symptoms of pneumoconiosis, cardiopulmonary function: F0 (normal) and pneumoconiosis grade: No. 3 alone, it is not sufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff’s pneumoconiosis disease type constituted Type 1 or more, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Therefore, the instant disposition is lawful.

3. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow