Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On April 27, 2010, the Defendant was partly awarded a contract to construct a multi-family house from the owner C to the “Seoul Haman-gun D, Hamnam-gun,” and performed construction work.

On November 19, 2010, when the defendant was working, he employed as a daily allowance system for the defendant, completed cement work, etc. of the floor boiler room of the first floor, and there was a disaster where the truck was cut off while he loaded a truck, resulting in an injury, such as chesting a chest.

On July 2, 2013, the Labor Welfare Corporation rendered a disposition that “the amount of benefits for industrial accident compensation insurance equivalent to KRW 32,739,060” was collected from C on the grounds that the construction works of the boiler room installed by E falls under the scope of C’s construction work.

Accordingly, around September 12, 2013, the Plaintiff (Plaintiff) filed a lawsuit with the Changwon District Court claiming the cancellation of the above collection disposition against the Labor Welfare Corporation (Defendant). On February 25, 2014, at the Changwon District Court located in Sungwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Seoul, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the revocation lawsuit No. 2013 Guhap 2462.

Defendant 1 before the first executive presiding judge of the first executive branch of the instant case, “E’s daily allowances are the first executive branch of the instant case.”

“The lower court determined that the part of the boiler room was not necessary to do work and did not do so,” and that the Plaintiff would take the 1st floor boiler room into the board and handle personnel expenses if the Plaintiff took people and performed a job.

I have entered the work on the day.

“,” and “E” need to be followed by the direction of any person.

The date of receipt of the plaintiff's instructions and the day of receipt of the plaintiff's order has served E.

It is necessary to answer “,” and whether the Plaintiff instructs the boiler room work at any time at the time to the witness.

The term "interpellation" was prepared and talked after making a confirmation letter.

The answer shall be made, and the work at the time of the accident shall not be in the first contract.