The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defense counsel (definite and misunderstanding of legal principles) is not false in light of the overall purport of testimony, and the statement that the defendant appeared as a witness in Suwon District Court Decision 21 on Nov. 4, 2014, that the part of the statement to the effect that the last customer was absent from around 16 hours before the occurrence of fire from April 12, 2013 to April 11:45, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as "part of the statement about his/her hand") is not false in light of the whole purport of testimony, and that "I asked you am of at least when he/she would finite," and "I will not answer the question "I will not attend on the day finite," and "I will not see the part of the defendant's reply to the last customer's answer" and "I will not see it as "I will not see that I will not answer the above questions" and "I will not see it as "I will not answer the last 250th day.".

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on perjury and thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment by convicting all of the facts charged in the instant case.

Judgment

On November 4, 2014, the Defendant was present at the court of Suwon District Court No. 21, which was located in Pyeongtaek-ro 1036, Pyeongtaek-ro, Pyeongtaek-do on November 16, 2014, and the Defendant took an oath as a witness of a claim for damages filed by Plaintiff G against Defendant D.

The Defendant’s agent C’s attorney-at-law (from April 12, 2013 to April 11, 2013, which was settled by the last customer prior to the occurrence of the instant fire).