1. The Defendant, on October 12, 2017, caused the termination of title trust with respect to No. C Building D in Chuncheon City to Nonparty B.

1. Basic facts

A. In the case No. 2015No1391 on October 6, 2015, the Defendant’s husband B was sentenced to a fine of KRW 10 million on the ground of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (recrimination) with respect to the public official in charge of permission for land division from E and F, and a fine of KRW 150 million on the ground of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (recination) with respect to which the public official in charge of permission for land division was granted from E and the imprisonment for one year and six months, and a penalty of KRW 154 million was imposed on the aggregate of KRW 154 million received in return for the above good offices, and the above judgment became final and conclusive by

B. B Of the above additional charges, April 18, 2017, and the same year

5.26.26. The same year

6. 28. 5 million won each, each year.

9. A total of KRW 21 million paid on January 17, 2018, in total, KRW 27 million and KRW 3 million.

C. The defendant, on August 5, 2004, on the ground of the sale on August 5, 2004 with respect to the C Building D (hereinafter "the apartment of this case").

7. 20. Registration of ownership transfer was completed.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts that there is no dispute between the parties, Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 25, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. The plaintiff asserted that B held title trust of the apartment of this case to the defendant, who is the spouse, and that B as the creditor of the additional collection charge against B, terminated the title trust agreement between B and the defendant on the apartment of this case by delivering a copy of the complaint of this case in subrogation of B in order to secure the responsible property of B which is currently insolvent. Thus, the defendant asserts that B is obligated to perform the procedure for ownership transfer registration due to the termination

The defendant asserts that the plaintiff's claim of this case is unfair since he purchased G Apartment H (hereinafter "G apartment") under the name of the defendant as the sales price, not the apartment of this case registered under the name of the defendant under the title trust with B, but the apartment of this case was not registered under the name of the defendant.

B. Whether B is insolvent.