logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.06.07 2016고단8266
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 28, 2015, the Defendant would allow the victim E, who is the student of the pertinent driving school operated by the Defendant in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, to establish and obtain the establishment of a driving school with which he/she can receive a national subsidy from the Ministry of Employment and Labor.

It is expected that 5 million won per professor for the examination for certification and evaluation of workplace skill development training institutions may be awarded a high score of 40,000 won on the face of each class.

The phrase "the purchase cost of restoration equipment necessary for obtaining certification and evaluation has changed to 18.7 million won."

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party in connection with the certification evaluation of the Motor Vehicle Management Institute, he/she has no intention or ability to have the injured party receive the certification evaluation of the Motor Vehicle Management Institute because he/she thought that the defendant will repay the existing debts

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was transferred KRW 38.7 million to a new bank account in the name of the defendant under the name of the victim for the same day solicitation expenses, etc.

2. On March 3, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E who urged the establishment of the State-Funded Private Teaching Institutes at the above place, “AD Private Teaching Institutes established a Motor Vehicle Management Institute and newly built it with a loan of KRW 250,000,000,000, in lieu of obtaining the certification evaluation, in lieu of obtaining the certification evaluation, the Defendant would take over the D Private Teaching Institutes whose period of use was guaranteed for a ten-year period.”

However, in fact, the above D Institute building operated by the defendant is not a new building by the defendant, and there is no relationship between F and F, the owner of the above D Institute building, and 10 million won out of the rent deposit of 30 million won from May 7, 2015, the above D Institute building was leased and operated in the monthly rent of 3.7 million won, and the above building was leased and operated in excess of the monthly rent of 20 million won, and there was no intention or ability to accept the private teaching institute as agreed by the victim.

The defendant is the victim as above.

arrow