The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant was driving a DNA car.

At around 10:40 on July 17, 2015, the Defendant proceeded at a speed of 90km each hour among five lanes 360.7km points south of the Jung-do Highway located in the west-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Gyeonggi-do.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the right and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle and to accurately manipulate the steering and brakes so as to prevent accidents.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 이를 게을리 한 채 갑자기 왼쪽으로 진행하다가 급하게 오른쪽으로 진행한 과실로 피고인의 라세티 승용차의 우측앞문 부분으로 2차로에서 직진중이던 E 봉고Ⅲ 1톤 화물차의 앞범퍼 좌측 부분을 충격하여 위 봉고Ⅲ 1톤 화물차가 3차로로 튕겨져 3차로에서 직진중이던 F 레조 승용차와 충격하게 하고, 피고인의 라세티 승용차의 우측 뒷 부분으로 위 레조 승용차의 앞범퍼 부분을 충격 후 계속 우전방으로 진행하여 피고인의 라세티 승용차의 앞범퍼 부분으로 5차로에서 작업중이던 피해자 G(65세)과 피해자 H(57세)를 충격하고, 그 곳에 정차중이던 I 5톤 화물차 후미 부분을 충격하였다.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, the victim G with serious injury, such as a ductal of the upper right dull, etc., and the victim H suffered from the Defendant’s abandonment of the ductal of the ductal and the ductal of the ductal of the ductal

2. In light of the judgment, the instant crime falls under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and thus, cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records of the instant case, the victims can be recognized as having withdrawn their wish to punish the Defendant after the instant indictment was instituted.