A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

80,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the main owner of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government sexual traffic business establishment, and C is the employee of the above business establishment.

On January 3, 2012, around 16:00 on January 3, 2012, the Defendant, along with C, assisted the act of similarity by allowing D, a female employee, to enter the sexual flag of the male son whose name is unknown, or to see it by hand, and received KRW 70,00 from the said male son as the price for sexual traffic, and among which the Defendants received KRW 30,00 from the said male son as the price for sexual traffic, the Defendants became the price for the mediation of sexual traffic.

In addition, from January 2, 2012 to January 3, 2012, the Defendant and C have employed D, E, etc. as female employees at the said business establishment from January 2, 2012 to January 3, 2012, and arrange sexual traffic to the male grandchildren whose names cannot be ascertained by the aforementioned methods. The Defendant received from six male grandchildren who have engaged in sexual traffic during the said period 70,000 won per capita as the price for sexual traffic, and received from six male grandchildren who have engaged in sexual traffic during the said period the sum of 180,000 won in return for arranging sexual traffic (the Defendant takes 80,000 won among them), and C received from the Defendant in return for arranging sexual traffic.

As a result, the defendant conspired with C to arrange commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol for C, D, or E;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Court rulings and summary orders;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on control field photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of the latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. does not have much harm to the sound sexual culture, and the defendant continues to shift from five times to five times from 2002 to similar places after regulation.