logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.06.14 2017구단70857
추가상병불승인처분취소
Text

1. On February 14, 2017, the Defendant pertaining to the left-hand shoulder and spawn fever against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 15, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) caused an accident that was crashed in the process of dismantling the scambling (hereinafter “instant accident”) among the construction works of the building on December 15, 2016 (hereinafter “the instant accident”); (b) brought an application for the additional examination of the instant accident to the Defendant on January 23, 201, after receiving the Defendant’s medical treatment approval from the Defendant during the course of the occupational accident, for the further examination of the instant accident (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

B. On February 14, 2017, the Defendant rendered a non-approval of the above additional injury application (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that “The instant additional injury in the MRI’s opinion is not clear, and the blood scamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscambamscams in light of the pamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscams

C. The Plaintiff, who was dissatisfied with the instant disposition, filed a request for review to the Defendant, but dismissed.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant additional disease was caused by the instant accident or caused by the shock of the instant accident, and the existing disease was rapidly aggravated rapidly above the natural running speed.

The defendant's disposition of this case on the different premise is unlawful.

B. Determination Domins, Gap evidence Nos. 5, 7, 8, and Eul evidence Nos. 3, and the purport of this court’s entrustment of medical record appraisal to the head of Seoul University Hospital and the entire arguments is as follows.

arrow