logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.02.07 2013가단35742
보험금
Text

1. With respect to one accident listed in the attached Form 1, insurance money based on the insurance contract for the plaintiff's defendant stated in the attached Form 2 against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 24, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a non-dividend comprehensive insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with the Defendant as the insured and with the content as shown in the attached Form 2 as the Defendant.

B. Major terms and conditions of the instant insurance contract for traffic accident settlement, loss, and loss (Drivers) are as follows.

1) An insurance company shall pay the amount of money paid by the insured as criminal agreement to each victim for each incident within the limit of 30,000,000 won to the insured as a loss for dealing with traffic accidents where the insured dies due to a motor vehicle accident that occurred rapidly and rapidly while driving a motor vehicle during the insurance period. 2) The term "motor vehicle" refers to passenger cars, buses, trucks, special motor vehicles, and dump trucks under Article 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Motor Vehicle Management Act, typ trucks under Article 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Motor Vehicle Management Act, typ trucks, concrete mixing trucks, concrete pumps for truck loading type type concrete pumps, truck-loading type car spraying, and typp trucks under Article 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Motor Vehicle Compensation Act (hereinafter referred to as "six-class construction machinery").

Provided, That while Class 6 construction machinery is used as work machinery, it shall not be considered as a motor vehicle.

C. On April 30, 2013, the Defendant was driving a B-T-type drilling on the concrete packing road of 4.1 meters wide from the central line, which is the bank in the two parallels of the Jeon Chang-gun, Kim Chang-gun, Kim Chang-gun, the lower court did not discover Category C which was followed by several meters later in order to turn on a way to one ton trucking from the front bank, and did not discover Category C which was going behind several meters later in order to turn on a way to one ton trucking from the front bank, and the same accident as Category 1, which was the same as Category 1, which caused the death of more than the front bank.

Da. d.

On May 12, 2013, the defendant is an accident in this case between C's inheritors.

arrow