logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2013.04.04 2013고정2
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. In the facts charged, the Defendant is an actual management owner of the Seocho-gu Busan Metropolitan Government B Co., Ltd., which is an employer who employs eight regular workers and engages in the manufacture and sale of phrases.

The Defendant, at the same place of business, worked from May 25, 201 to April 5, 2012, and retired from the said place of business, did not pay KRW 2,280,000, including KRW 1,100,000 in January 201 of the retired C, and KRW 1,10,000 in February of the same year, and KRW 80,000 in April of the same year, within 14 days from the date of retirement without agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment date of money and valuables.

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 109(2) of the same Act.

However, according to the records, C may recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant by mutual consent with the defendant around January 2013 after the institution of the instant prosecution. Thus, the instant prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow