The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the C representative located in Gyeonggi-si B, who runs an educational business with ten regular workers.

D’s wages of KRW 1,00,00 in October 2, 2013, which were worked from September 2, 2013 to June 2, 2014, and KRW 2,50,00 in November 2, 2013, and KRW 1,60,000 in December of the same year, and KRW 1,600,00 in January of 2014, and KRW 2,000 in March of the same year, and KRW 2,00,00 in April of the same year, and KRW 11,330,00 in total in June of the same year and June 1, 200 in the same year without agreement on the extension of payment date.

2. The judgment was based on the case that constitutes a crime falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act. According to the records, since workers D had withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.