1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion and the Defendants, as they resided in the second floor of the building located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government D (hereinafter “the second floor of the instant building”) and used the electric measuring instruments installed in the Plaintiff’s name, a multi-family house, together, should bear other electricity charges in their respective consumption.

However, the plaintiff was unfairly liable to pay a large amount of electricity fees despite the reduction of electricity fees as a disabled person.

Therefore, the Defendants should return 1,419,940 won to the Plaintiff as unjust enrichment.

2. We examine the judgment, and the plaintiff and defendant C, who were the second floor of the building of this case, from May 2014 to July 2015, when the plaintiff resided in the second floor of the building of this case from the second floor of the building of this case to the second floor of the building of this case, and used the electrical meters installed in the plaintiff's name and shared the charges. The plaintiff is the disabled of the third grade without delay. The plaintiff is the disabled of this case, and the plaintiff's reduction of and exemption from the electricity fees within the limit of KRW 8,000 per month from the Korea Electric Power Corporation does not dispute between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the whole arguments in the evidence Nos. 8,10,11,12, and 14. However, the above facts and the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone are insufficient to recognize the defendants' unjust enrichment amounting to the plaintiff, and there is no evidence to acknowledge otherwise. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.