The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal points out the problem that the e-mail cooling and heating apparatus was frequently operated by the e-user (hereinafter “the e-user”) at the 2nd floor of the D market building (hereinafter “the instant commercial building”) around August 2004, when installing the e-conditioning and heating apparatus to the e-user (hereinafter “the instant user”) and pointed out the problem that the e-conditioning and heating apparatus was installed frequently, and the e-mail operator who is charged with the improvement measures is required to install the additional electric exhauster. The Defendant did not know the fact that the e-conditioning and heating equipment installed the additional electric exhauster at the right side of the entrance entrance of the instant user (hereinafter “in-house”) and did not know that the electric exhauster was connected without going through the electric measuring apparatus. In January 2013, the Defendant did not require the installation engineer to directly install the air exhauster and air exhauster or to install the electrical exhauster.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is from 1999 to 30, the Defendant operated the instant user on the second floor of the instant commercial building located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si C.

On August 25, 2004, the Defendant, within the pertinent user who was operated by the Defendant, installed the FFMM to install the FFMM equipment, and had 4 electric wires arbitrarily connected to the electric breaker in the second floor electric power distribution board of the second floor used in the instant commercial building, and linked the four electric wires to the electric breaker through the ceiling instead of connecting them to the electric breaker.

The defendant on January 1, 2006.