1. The defendant

A. Of the land size of 13 square meters in macro-si, each point of the attached Form 3, 4, 5, 6, and 3 is linked in sequence.

Basic Facts

On September 2, 1994, the Plaintiff related to the ownership of land completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale with respect to D 43 square meters (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned land”), C 13 square meters prior to C (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned land”) and E large scale 174 square meters, and 97.68 square meters for one-story living facilities in the middle floor of the 17.68 square meters in light of the land, and 2.8 square meters in light of light-weight steel-frame, steel-frame, steel-frame, steel-frame, steel-frame, steel-frame, steel-frame, and roof, etc. (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned building”). The Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of inheritance with respect to F. 201 square meters on February 23, 2007, G large scale 33 square meters (hereinafter “third-party land”).

Plaintiff

The plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the removal of the part in violation of paragraph (2) of this Article and the delivery of the part in the ship connected in order to each point of (a) 5, 6, 7, 9, and 5, among the land owned by the plaintiff, that part of the block structure of the block structure (the part (a) of the sound part (a) of the block structure 1) owned by the defendant (the part of the building owned by the defendant (hereinafter referred to as "the first building owned by the defendant") is against 16m2 of the land owned by the plaintiff, and was judged in favor of the plaintiff (this Court Decision 2012Ga7945 decided August 20, 2013), and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

【L1 Map 1】 In the course of the lawsuit on the land owned by the Plaintiff for land owned by the Defendant, part of the building owned by the Plaintiff was a part of 7 square meters in the ship (B) connected each point of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 in sequence, among the third land owned by the Defendant.

The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking the implementation of the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer based on the prescriptive acquisition as of September 22, 2014 (see this Court Decision 2015Da25159, Jan. 10, 2017), and received a favorable judgment (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2015Da25159, Jan. 10, 2017). The Defendant’s appeal against this case and the

【Drawing2】 DGH’s current status of land No. 2 owned by the Defendant, a temporary building of the one-story position panel (hereinafter “Defendant-owned building”) owned by the Plaintiff.