1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case is that of the court of first instance citing the reasoning of the judgment as to the instant case, since it is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance excluding adding or adding the following matters. Thus, it is citing this as is in accordance

2. The following is added to the 19th 2th 19th 2th son of the judgment of the first instance, and the second 20th 2th son of the judgment: “Evidence No. 51-1, A, 59, 60, Eul evidence No. 6, evidence No. 7-1, 2, 3, and Eul evidence No. 8-1, 2, 8-2, each of the statements No. 8-1, 8-2, and this Court shall be added to the ground for recognition.”

f. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for the cancellation of registration under the Act on Special Measures, by deceiving the guarantor, etc., even though the Defendant did not have received a donation of 11,927 square meters from the Plaintiff, and filed a lawsuit for the cancellation of registration under the Act on Special Measures, Daegu District Court Decision 2016Kadan25666, which was sentenced on April 5, 2017, and filed an appeal with the Daegu District Court 2017Na4094, which was sentenced to the dismissal of appeal on September 14, 2017. While the Plaintiff filed an appeal with the Supreme Court 2017Da4694 Decided September 29, 2017, the Plaintiff was sentenced to the appellate court’s decision for the rejection of registration on November 29, 2017. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for the cancellation of registration of ownership under the Act on Special Measures against the Defendant’s 201 Daegu District Court Decision 2017Ma14367, Dec. 17, 2017.