1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the instant case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court of first instance added or added some contents and added the judgment of this court. Thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance

2. The part added or added shall be 6 pages of the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance with "by May 30, 2005" "by May 30, 2005."

The second half of the judgment of the court of first instance, "Evidences 3, 5, 7, 8, 1, 3, and 5 of Category A, 3 through 5, 7, 8, 1 through 3, and 5 of Category B, 16, shall be added to "Evidences 3 through 5, 7, 8, 1 through 3, and 5".

The following shall be added to the 7th sentence of the judgment of the first instance, 13th sentence “not to calculate his salary class.”

No. 30 of May 30, 201 to May 29, 2012, an evaluation table for fixed-term contract worker (Evidence A 2) with the plaintiff is the plaintiff's civil petition for occupation, etc., and the first evaluator's comprehensive opinion is stated as follows: "I will perform without delay all kinds of civil petition affairs and various investigation affairs related to occupancy, which is the main duties of the B branch," and the second evaluator's comprehensive opinion is as "I will have a high understanding of civil petition affairs and prompt friendship." Accordingly, the first 15th 15th 15th 15th 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance (related to Article 14 (2)) is written in [Attachment 3] the career conversion standard table (related to Article 14 (2)].

3. The portion determined additionally by this Court

A. Since the Defendant’s assertion that the Plaintiff was converted to a regular position cannot be deemed as entirely closely closely close to the business auxiliary to the previous office as an industrial complex management business, the Plaintiff’s work experience in the Plaintiff’s work auxiliary does not constitute “the work closely connected to the job scheduled for employment” under the career conversion standard table in attached Table 3, and is ultimately not subject to career conversion.

B. Determination was made on May 2009.