logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.11.11 2013고정493
무고
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 23, 2012, the Defendant submitted a false complaint to the public service offices of the Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office located in the Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office in the Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office for the purpose of having C, D, and E receive criminal punishment. On October 2, 2012, the Defendant filed a false complaint to the above C, etc., and on October 13:16, 2012, the investigation of the Busan Busan Southern Police Station and the supplementary statement from the Economic 2 Team office, and filed the following false complaint.

The facts of the complaint are as follows: "A, D (C's counsel), and E (C's counsel) in collusion to the effect that the defendant's lawsuit fraud was punished because the defendant's lawsuit fraud was committed in the name of the complainant (the defendant) by forging the subcontract document for the wage construction work dated November 15, 2004 and submitting one copy of the subcontract document for the wage construction work dated August 24, 2007 to the civil court on July 10, 2008.

However, in fact, while working as an employee of the company run by the defendant C, the defendant directly prepared each of the above temporary wage subcontract agreements, but retired from office when there was a dispute between the defendant C and C in relation to the payment of retirement allowances, the defendant made a false assertion and caused the complaint.

Nevertheless, around August 23, 2012, the defendant submitted the above complaint to the public official in charge who is unable to know the name in the public service center of the Dong Office of Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office, and made a false statement after receiving the supplementary statement from the complainant, and made a false statement, and rejected the above C, D, and E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Requests for appraisal, the application of subcontract agreements and statutes;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow