In the case of each of the crimes described in the Decision 2019dan738, 2020dan269, the defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, and the decision 2019Kadan1614 shall be written.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2019 Highest 738" prepared a false complaint against C and submitted it to an investigation agency for the purpose of having C receive criminal punishment at the defendant's house located in Busan Northern-gu B, and tried to make a false statement at the investigation agency.

Accordingly, the Defendant, around October 16, 2018, prepared a written complaint to the effect that “The Defendant (C) opened the cell phone (FG) of the complainants (Defendants) at the store (Defendants) in Busan Northern-gu, and received an identification card from the complainants (Defendants) on the ground that “The Defendant shall give him an identification card for one day for the opening of a mobile phone.” The Defendant shall be in charge of the charge of the crime described in this part of the facts charged to the extent that it does not infringe on the Defendant’s right to defense on October 18, 2018, and shall revise ex officio the date of the crime to the extent that it does not violate the Defendant’s right to defense.”

By mail, the public service offices of the Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office located in Gangseo-dong 1862, Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office in Gangseo-gu, Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office received a complaint, and continuously attended the investigation of the Busan Northern Police Station and the first team office of the economy, located in 63, Busan Northern District Public Prosecutor's Office around November 18, 2018, and made a statement to the police officer in charge "I have forged the two application for joining the defendant's Ha I and JK mobile phone in their own mind", and "I have the right to open the cell phone and file a complaint for the crime of forging private documents and the crime of uttering by forging the application for the mobile phone subscription which the defendant's person (C) did not have prepared."

However, the facts are that the Defendant settled the payment of the mobile phone unpaid by the previous Defendant with the subsidy that he opened a new mobile phone via C and the mobile phone, and then agreed to open the mobile phone through the mobile phone, and the Defendant voluntarily prepared an application for joining the above two mobile phone (HI and JK), and C uses the name of the Defendant by stealing.