The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (five million won penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following, the judgment : (a) the Defendant was placed at the new wall, and the Defendant was placed at the fourth road, resulting in the instant traffic accident and causing traffic impediment to non-products; (b) the Defendant did not contact with the insurance company, left the site, and did not change the sentencing conditions compared with the lower court; and (c) the Defendant did not seem to have any particular change in the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, and thus, the Defendant’s above assertion by the lower court is unreasonable.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 148-2 and Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act on the 10th day of the application of the law of the lower judgment on the 10th day, since it is apparent that the “Article 148 and Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act” is a clerical error in the “Article 148 and Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act,” and thus, it is ex officio correction pursuant to Article 25