The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is as follows: (a) there is no fact that the Defendant committed an indecent act by deceiving the victim E’s buckbucks; (b) there was no assault by the victim C, such as bucking at her cuck or her dried with electronic tobacco, etc.; and (c) the victim C’s upper condition is extremely minor and is naturally cured by the lapse of the time, and thus, it does not constitute “injury” under Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act.

2. Determination

A. The lower court also asserted the same purport.

The lower court rejected the Defendant’s assertion as follows by explaining the judgment on the Defendant’s assertion.

“2. Determination

A. The victim of a forced indecent act committed in this court, and whether the defendant was indicted for the second time in this court, “the defendant sleeps the victim’s humbry with his humbry with his humbry and three times tumbry.

“In response to the question, the Defendant stated that “I have placed her lele on one occasion, and her her mt will not memory.” However, as to “I have reported her bucks to the victim’s bucks short of the examination color at the time, I reported her string, but the Defendant sustained her clothes in this Section.”

“In addition, the victim’s bucks became only bucks.”

In making a statement at an investigative agency with respect to violence cases between C and the Defendant, the owner of the business at the time of the victim, there was a possibility of exaggeration or false statement to the owner of the business at the time of making a statement. However, even if so, since punishment for C has been terminated (a summary order of KRW 2 million), it is less necessary to maintain the above statement, and in particular, one of the main parts of the facts charged in this part of this part of the facts charged, is not well memoryd as to “nicking am.m.”

However, the "the fact that the defendant met the victim's bucks."