beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.
Reasons
1. On March 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 21:45 on March 16, 2017, and around 21:45, the Defendant was seated after the victim D (at the age of 26) located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, in order to view the victim’s new plate in a restaurant; and (b) the Defendant forced the victim to commit an indecent act by making the victim’s her own hand three times
2. The summary of the Defendant’s and his defense counsel’s assertion is that the Defendant considered the victim, who was next to the instant case, would not drink the alcohol as his hand, and the brusium part was somewhat weak, and the Defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victim due to her her amb and her ambt.
3. In the crime of coercion of judgment, indecent act in the crime of indecent act is objectively causing sexual humiliation or aversion to the general public and is contrary to good sexual moral sense, and thus infringing on the victim’s sexual freedom. Whether it is so determined ought to be carefully determined by comprehensively taking into account the victim’s intent, gender, age, the relationship before the perpetrator and the victim, circumstances leading to the act, specific manner leading to the act, the surrounding objective situation, and the sexual moral sense of the age (see Supreme Court Decision 2001Do2417, Apr. 26, 2002). In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is sufficient to prove that the defendant committed indecent act by the judge was committed three times by the victim who intentionally commits an indecent act against the victim and forced the victim to commit an indecent act to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt.
It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
① In this Court, the victim suffered sexual humiliation by the Defendant, who was seated next to the Defendant at the time of the instant case, stating that her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her
Until the defendant's finger was feld after her her her am, it will be memory.