1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. On September 26, 2011, the Defendant issued and delivered to the Plaintiff an amount of KRW 50 million on December 26, 2011, the payment date, and one promissory note, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the place of payment, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the place of payment, the place of payment, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant promissory note”). The Plaintiff offered the instant promissory note on the date of payment but rejected payment.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay KRW 50 million to the Plaintiff the instant promissory note amount.

B. On August 16, 2012, C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) issued to the Defendant an amounting to KRW 40 million, payment of KRW 40 million, Macheon-gun in Gyeonggi-do, Macheon-gun in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and an addressee’s blank, one copy of the check (hereinafter “instant check”). The Defendant endorseded on the check of this case’s check of this case’s check of this case’s check of this case’s check of this case’s check of this case’s check of this case’s check of this case’s check of this case’s check of this case’s check to the Plaintiff, but the Plaintiff was denied payment as a cause of non-transaction.

Therefore, the Defendant, who is an endorser of the check of this case, is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 40 million of the check of this case.

C. In addition, the defendant, as a director of the non-party company, endorsed it to the meaning of joint and several sureties on the share sheet of this case issued by the non-party company, and as the representative director of the non-party company, through D who is the defendant's husband, deliver the share sheet of this case to the plaintiff and borrowed money necessary for the non-party company's construction from the plaintiff. Thus, the above loan amounting to 40 million won should be liable as

Even if the Defendant did not directly issue the Promissory Notes and did not directly endorse the check of this case, D, the husband of the Defendant, while holding the Defendant’s certificate of personal seal impression, seal imprint, etc., issued the Promissory Notes in the name of the Defendant, and this is subject to comprehensive delegation by the Defendant.