A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

B The captain of subparagraph C, which is a fishing vessel destroyed, is the captain of subparagraph C, the defendant is the fishing ground of subparagraph C, and D is the captain of subparagraph E, which is a fishing vessel destroyed.

B around 21:35 on October 201, 2015, around G convenience stores located in Jindo-si, Jindo-si, and had a dispute over the drinking together with H. Around 21:35, B was under dispute with H. A. B, after receiving a report from a person who was unable to perform his/her name, he/she was under the control of J. K with the police officer, who was called out after receiving the report by the person who was not in charge of his/her name, and he/she was under the control of K, and the police officer was under the control of J to return back to H., and he/she was under the control of K to “the knife the knife with the knife,” and “the knife with the knife with the knife and the knife with the knife’s knife.”

As a result, B interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and suppression of police officers' crimes.

In addition, B was removed from J and K as above at the above date and at the above location, and the market price of L, the ownership of L, which was placed in front of the above convenience point, has damaged it by emitting a alzinium flusium in several times.

The Defendant and D attempted to stop the arrest of a flagrant offender who was arrested from J and K by the above act at the above time and at the above place.

In other words, the defendant reached K, "I will see why he will die, why he will we see, why he will we see, what he will we see, what he will we see," and "I will see why you will see, why you will see, and why you will not see," and "I will see, why you will see," and "I will see, why you will see, how you will see, and how you will see."

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with D and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to J, K, and L

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting an offense;