A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, together with B, appears to be a victim’s name according to the victim E evidence records, etc. in light of the victim E in light of and around January 11, 2019, and the victim’s name stated in the indictment appears to be a clerical error.

B, as the person who is well aware of the relatives by marriage of the FF G president of the company, B had the authority to lease a pharmacy in H.

The defendant and B introduce themselves, and the defendant and B are changed from J to F by the I Building Management Business Operator.

I On the first floor of the I Building, KK is now established with the separation of pharmacies, and half of the office of the cosmetic store and the public relations office of Incheon City is a pharmacy.

Until March 2019, the above K and the pharmacy will be leased and operated. Therefore, the contract deposit and consulting costs will be changed. If it is impossible to enter into the contract deposit and consulting costs, the whole amount of the consulting costs that we received will be refunded.

“A false statement is made to the effect that “,” and the Defendant further is a certain person.

In addition, I believe that it will not be trustable, but will be trusted by a public intermediary.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, in fact, M (owner) operating the I building had already entered into a lease agreement on the first floor of the I building with N (State) operated directly by K on January 9, 2019, between January 14, 2019 and February 28, 202, with the term of lease from January 14, 2019 to February 20, 202, and had cosmetics on the first floor of the I building extended the term of lease until December 20, 2018, with the extended term of lease until June 30, 2019. The Defendant was not an authorized intermediary, and the Defendant and B did not have any intention or ability to return the consulting cost already received.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in the name of K consulting expenses on January 11, 2019, is KRW 15 million from the damaged person; KRW 10 million in the name of K deposit around January 12, 2019; and a pharmacy around January 15, 2019.